JustMe  // January 30, 2010 at 12:12 pmIMHO, Spitzer was set up, but I still am not sure he was involved with “that woman.”  By the way, who were Clients #1-8?I think he had to resign for some other reason.  Otherwise, he would not be back in the news commenting on Wall Street issues.  After all, he was “the expert.”As far as Guiliani is concerned, he is “thick in the muck.”  But, then again, who would know better how it is done than someone who does it?  If he aggressively went after the &#2t,0;corrup82” he would quickly be fitted with a pair of “cement shoes” so he can only comment.Thanks for asking…Linda
トップ   編集 差分 バックアップ 添付 複製 名前変更 リロード   新規 一覧 単語検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS